All 66 outline templates

Howcatchem

Also called the inverted detective story. The audience sees the crime from the culprit's perspective in act one, then watches a detective close the noose. The puzzle is not “who done it” but “how will they be caught” — the tension lives in whether proof exists, whether the detective is smart enough, and whether small mistakes will undo the killer's plan.

Who it's for

  • Mystery and thriller writers who want to flip the whodunit formula.
  • Stories about morally complex killers readers find interesting despite knowing their guilt.
  • Writers interested in cat-and-mouse dynamics and irony (reader knows what detective doesn't).
  • Episodic TV structure (Columbo); also works as novels (Crime and Punishment, Ripley series).
  • Plots where the killer's cleverness or desperation is as compelling as their capture.

The beats

  1. Crime committed — audience sees the killer act. Their motive, method, desperation.
  2. Cover-up begins — killer's plan to escape, hide evidence, or deflect suspicion.
  3. Detective enters — investigation officially opens. Stakes clarified for the reader.
  4. Cat-and-mouse — detective follows clues; killer tries to stay ahead or cover tracks.
  5. Killer's mistake — an overlooked detail, a crack in the alibi, or a slip under questioning.
  6. Detective closes the gap — pieces align; the trap tightens.
  7. Confrontation — detective vs. culprit face-to-face. The moment of reckoning.
  8. Capture — justice, confession, or arrest. The story resolves.

Worked example

A spouse murders their partner for inheritance, carefully staging it as a break-in. The detective on the case is methodical but slow. We see the killer wipe down evidence, coach a fake witness, and stay outwardly grieving. The detective interviews them repeatedly, each time getting closer to the truth but never quite reaching it — the killer is sharp, and their story holds. Then, a forensic report comes back: tiny fibers under the victim's nails don't match any intruder. The killer's suit is tested. It matches.

The killer realizes they're caught. The final confrontation isn't dramatic violence; it's cold logic. The killer sits across from the detective, and all the careful lies unravel. The killer breaks, confesses, or protects themselves with a lawyer. The inheritance is forfeit. The story ends with the killer realizing their mistake: they thought they were cleverer than they were.

Strengths

Unique irony: reader watches the killer fail to understand they've left clues. The tension isn't suspense about identity but suspense about time and inevitability. The killer's increasing desperation as they sense the noose tightens is psychologically rich. Works beautifully in episodic format where the culprit is revealed in the first act, freeing later scenes for pure clever-ness and character depth.

Weaknesses

The killer must be sympathetic or compelling enough that we care to follow them for a chapter or more. A purely villainous or boring killer drains the hook. Also, if the detective is too slow or the clues too obvious, the middle sags: the reader gets impatient waiting for the detective to catch up. The format requires careful pacing to keep both the killer's dread and the detective's methodical approach engaging.

Pendraic notes

Pendraic seeds Howcatchem as an 8-beat Engine. Pair it with the Standard or Heavy structure preset. Use the “Crime committed” beat as your POV anchor for act one; if you're writing this in close third or first-person, make sure the killer's interiority is clear so the reader feels their desperation. The “Cat-and-mouse” beat is a good place to mark scene-level alternation between killer and detective POVs — tag those scenes explicitly so the AI understands the tension dynamic when you're drafting. The “Killer's mistake” beat is your story's turning point; plant the clue subtly much earlier so a careful reader could have caught it.